Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Luis Polo Galvez v. Western Refining Retail, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv11443
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Western Refining, Inc., Western Refining Retail, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Polo Galvez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Aleut Facilities Support Services, et al
as 2:2016cv02297
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GLAZING HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, Board of Trustees of the Painters, Glaziers and Floorcoverers Joint Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Trust, Board of Trustees of the Southern California, Arizona, Colorado, and Southern Nevada Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
ALEUT FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES, Diamond Resorts International, Inc., OCI Contracting Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Polo Garcia et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2015cv05337
Defendant:
Does and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Polo Garcia and Eddie Ortiz
In Re:
Wal-Mart Stores Wage and Hour Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 117, et al
as 3:2011cv05497
Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 117 and Arthur Polo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Otsuka et al v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv02780
Plaintiff:
Ann Otsuka, Ann Otsuka, Janis Keefe and others
Defendant:
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
