Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Adrienne Arrington et al v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arrington, Alecia Guarneros, Alexa Sanchez and others
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital Management LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Moreno v. Cardinal Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Joe Moreno
Defendant:
Cardinal Systems, Inc. and Fox Pools of York, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Poole v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
as 1:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Plaintiff:
Velvet Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
CAMPBELL v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2019cv12747
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, RICHARD POOL, THOMAS SUTHERLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PALENZUELA v. CLEAR CHOICE POOL AND SPA SERVICE LLC
as 3:2018cv12073
Plaintiff:
RYAN PALENZUELA
Defendant:
CLEAR CHOICE POOL AND SPA SERVICE LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PALENZUELA v. CLEAR CHOICE POOL AND SPA SERVICE LLC
as 3:2018cv12026
Plaintiff:
RYAN PALENZUELA
Defendant:
CLEAR CHOICE POOL AND SPA SERVICE LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BITTLE v. ALOHA POOL & SPA SERVICE, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv05246
Plaintiff:
NORMAN BITTLE
Defendant:
ALOHA POOL & SPA SERVICE, LLC and TIMOTHY SHERLOCK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
POOL v. CONTICO CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv03815
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POOL
Defendant:
CONTICO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
POOL v. CONTICO CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv03815
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POOL
Defendant:
CONTICO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
GARRECOA v. INCA POOL CORP. et al
as 3:2016cv00311
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GARRECOA
Defendant:
INCA POOL CORP. and ROMEG LIMA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
