Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pool et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 8:2021cv02785
Plaintiff:
Fred Pool and Raquel DeFigueiredo
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., Ltd. and Knauf New Building System (Tianjin) Co. Ltd (f/k/a Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft KG et al
as 8:2021cv02501
Plaintiff:
CDO Investments LLC, MCF Enterprises Inc, Joseph Niemiec and others
Defendant:
Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft KG, Knauf International, GMBH, Knauf Insulation GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guante v. Resposito et al
as 0:2015cv61542
Plaintiff:
Juan Guante
Defendant:
Michael Resposito and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST OF THE HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED TRUST SERIES IN ABS 2006-C UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 1, 2006
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
121 Duval Company et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv10018
Plaintiff:
121 Duval Company , 126 Duval Company , 135 Duval Company and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poole v. Caso et al
as 9:2010cv81305
Plaintiff:
Vincent Poole
Defendant:
Bart Caso, Roy Dunworth, Dunworth, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poole v. Poole et al
as 9:2010cv81306
Plaintiff:
Vincent Poole
Defendant:
Trellianie Bray Poole, Maurice Patrick Poole, Andrew Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Poole and Kent Company et al v. Tetra Tech, Inc.
as 1:2009cv21749
Plaintiff:
The Poole and Kent Company, The Poole and Kent Company, Myers Construction Group and others
Defendant:
Tetra Tech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
POOLE REALTY INC. v. KEEGAN HOMEBUILDERS INC
as 3:2007cv00411
Plaintiff:
POOLE REALTY INC
Defendant:
KEEGAN HOMEBUILDERS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
