Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pool v. Doe
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Teddy Pool
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pool v. Berlin et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Troy L. Pool
Defendant:
Jones County Sheriff Joe Berlin, Warden Jennifer Henderson, Lt. De'Quan Allen and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Poole v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 3:2018cv00529
Defendant:
Dr. William Brazier, Daniel Lonie, Gloria Perry and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Larry Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Easterling
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delvalle v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Esteban Delvalle
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Jason Russell, Joseph Dimaria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. MDOC et al
as 3:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Kathy Sue Hale Camacho
Defendant:
MDOC, State of Mississippi, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frith v. Rankin County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2012cv00791
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Frith, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Poole, Unknown Deputies and Bryan Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Poole et al
as 2:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Dwight Antonio Howard
Defendant:
Poole, Walker and Enlers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00597
Plaintiff:
Timothy Winters
Defendant:
M. Johnson, L. Brown, A. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Ford et al
as 2:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Crawthorne Poole
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Brian Patterson and Angie H. Deil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
