Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Maxfield et al v. Henderson et al
as 4:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Steve Maxfield, Robert F Kennedy, Jr, Liberty Initiative Fund and others
Defendant:
Diedre M Henderson and Ryan Cowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Howarth v. Stout et al
as 4:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
Sandy Laverta Iverson Stout, Randal Curtis Iverson doing business as Paradise Design Pool and Spa Superstore and Sandy Laverta Iverson Stout doing business as Paradise Design Pool and Spa Superstore
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Gagon et al v. Pristine Pools and Spa
as 2:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Shane Gagon and Gina Gagon
Defendant:
Pristine Pools and Spa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. 400 Acres of Land
as 2:2018mc00586
Defendant:
400 Acres of Land
Plaintiff:
USA
Petitioner:
Qualtrics
Interested Party:
Theresa Sheahan, Brown, Mayme C. Heirs of, Christine Tanis and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Certified DEF v. Campo & Poole Distributing
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Certified DEF
Defendant:
Campo & Poole Distributing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demarco et al v. Nabors Industries et al
as 2:2016cv01242
Plaintiff:
M. Brandon DeMarco and Lana DeMarco
Defendant:
Nabors Industries, Nabors Well Services , Pool Well Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Poole v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01053
Plaintiff:
Gina Poole
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
HM Capital Credit v. Paradise Pool & Spa of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2016cv00647
Plaintiff:
HM Capital Credit
Defendant:
Paradise Pool & Spa of Wisconsin and Kimberly Schliebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
