Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ball v. Baker et al
as 7:2021cv06418
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Ball
Defendant:
Charles A. Baker, Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein and others
Nominal Defendant:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Perez et al v. Way Fong LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01984
Plaintiff:
Julio Guaman, Jose Guaman and Gerardo Perez
Defendant:
Wally Poon, Way Fong LLC, Way Fong Holding Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Negrete v. Poons Liquors, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04454
Defendant:
Poons Liquors, Inc., Surinder Sahni, Hipolito Avila and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Negrete
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Poon v. Apple NYC Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv09647
Plaintiff:
Mei Chun Poon
Defendant:
Apple NYC Corp., Touch of East Nails Spa Inc. and Wen Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Poon v. Apple NYC Corp., d/b/a Apple NYC Day Spa et al
as 1:2017cv06954
Defendant:
Apple NYC Corp., d/b/a Apple NYC Day Spa, Touch of East Nails Spa Inc. and Wen Chen
Plaintiff:
Mei Chun Poon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cross v. Conway et al
as 1:2017cv08244
Plaintiff:
Ali L. Cross
Defendant:
Clauide Conway, Sophia Khan, Yan Poon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ng v. King Henry Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Chee Sum Ng
Defendant:
King Henry Realty, Inc. , Poon Lut Mei and Wong Tung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 1:2012cv08333
Plaintiff:
John Joyce-Summerfeld, Parithan Kungsuvvan, Luz Martinez Acosta and others
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
