Cases 1 - 10 of 12
VEGA v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
FIDEL VEGA
Defendant:
RACHEL THOMPSON, PRADIP PATEL, M.D., JEFFERY WILK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ-PEREZ v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2018cv09184
Plaintiff:
SALVADOR GONZALEZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
ORTIZ, CASSANO, PRADIP PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUDAJ v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2017cv12106
Plaintiff:
ALEX RUDAJ
Defendant:
DAVID E ORTIZ, NICOLETTA TURNER-FOSTER, MD, PRADIP PATEL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANNS v. SIMS et al
as 1:2017cv03815
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. MANNS
Defendant:
T. SIMS, T. HOEY, RAVI SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKSTONE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2016cv08600
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. BLACKSTONE
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, ASHLEY STARK, SHERRI LILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNS v. SIMMS et al
as 1:2016cv04729
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MANNS
Defendant:
T. SIMMS, T. HOEY, RAVI SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GARCIA v. DE LASALLE et al
as 1:2014cv05242
Plaintiff:
JOSE NICHOLAS GARCIA
Defendant:
ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, M.D. , PRADIP PATEL, M.D. , STEVEN ESPOSITO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLIE v. ESPOSITO et al
as 1:2014cv03704
Plaintiff:
DONTA TYRONE GILLIE
Defendant:
STEVEN ESPOSITO, PRADIP PATEL, M.D. and ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. LOPEZ DE LASALLE et al
as 1:2012cv03711
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, PRADIP PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUTCH v. PATEL et al
as 1:2009cv02981
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Defendant:
PRADIP PATEL, VICENTE ELIAS, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
