Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LOPEZ et al v. MAX FINKELSTEIN LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
ERIKA LOPEZ and SERGIO LOPEZ
Defendant:
MAX FINKELSTEIN LLC, DUKE REALTY CORP doing business as DUKE ACQUISITION INC, COMPTON MERGER SUB LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ECKERT v. US FOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv18177
Defendant:
US FOODS, INC. and PROLOGIS, L.P.
Plaintiff:
DAVID ECKERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ECKERT v. US FOODS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv18177
Defendant:
US FOODS, INC. and PROLOGIS, L.P.
Plaintiff:
DAVID ECKERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
Thompson v. Liberty Property Trust et al
as 1:2019cv02230
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, William Hankowsky, Lambda OP Acquisition LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
PROLOGIS TARGETED FUND US LOGISTICS, LP v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv04763
Defendant:
BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
PROLOGIS TARGETED US LOGISTICS FUND, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Breland v. Prologis et al
as 1:2010cv01400
Plaintiff:
Gregory Breland
Defendant:
Prologis and Kuehne and Nagel Logistics inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCBT CORPORATION v. PROLOGIS SIX RIVERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 5:2009cv06195
Plaintiff:
SCBT CORPORATION
Defendant:
PROLOGIS SIX RIVERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and PROLOGIS SIX RIVERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
PROLOGIS SIX RIVERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. SCBT CORPORATION
as 5:2009cv06178
Plaintiff:
PROLOGIS SIX RIVERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
SCBT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
