Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Garlett v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Elaina Garlett
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yang v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 4:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Emily Qian Yang
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company, The, The Procter & Gamble Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Barton v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Teresa Barton
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, The Proctor & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company, BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Averhart et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al
as 4:2017cv01768
Plaintiff:
Annie Averhart , Kristen Boatman , Clyde Brown, Jr. and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratshidaho v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 6:2016cv03417
Plaintiff:
Isaac Ratshidaho
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, Astra USA Inc., AstraZeneca AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirk v. United Behavior Health, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
David J. Kirk
Defendant:
United Behavior Health, Inc. and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
