Cases 31 - 40 of 172
Entegra Bank v. Wald Wood Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02071
Plaintiff:
Entegra Bank
Defendant:
Wald Wood Products, Inc., Thomas C. Wald, Karen R. Wald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Ball et al v. Dometic Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv00130
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ball and Tammy Ball
Defendant:
Dometic Corporation and Electrolux Home Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixie Metal Products Inc v. Huffman Construction LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Dixie Metal Products Inc
Defendant:
Huffman Construction LLC and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Hays v. Connecticut Valley Arms Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hays
Defendant:
John Does and BlackPowder Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. All Storage Products Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00658
Plaintiff:
Deborah Washington
Defendant:
All Storage Products Inc, Ronald W Collar and Brian J Beck
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bad Boy Inc v. Intimidator Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Bad Boy Inc
Defendant:
Intimidator Inc and RF Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Ford
as 3:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Donna Ford
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Sauceda
as 4:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Juan Pablo Sauceda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Miguel A Ramirez and MNK Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv02040
Plaintiff:
Christy Wood and Joe Wood
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. , Depuy Spine, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
