Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant:
Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant:
Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47*
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al.
as 5:2009cv00191
Defendant:
Central Regional Hospital, Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever formerly known as Lever Bros. doing business as Unilever, Consumers Energy Company and others
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY D/B/A PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS, INC. v. Ace American Insurance Company
as 5:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY D/B/A PROGRESS ENERGY CAROLINAS, INC.
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
