Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Marshall v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00231
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Progressive Direct Insurance Company and Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Zenas A. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lomax v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Malaika Lomax
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Progressive Gulf Insurance Company, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hollingsworth et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Hollingsworth and Nevedia Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company , Progressive Direct Insurance Company , Progressive Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Collins et al v. Progressive Gulf Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv00504
Plaintiff:
Sharlet Collins and Houston Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Progressive Gulf Insurance Company and Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach v. Mountain Laurel Assurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Brian Roach
Defendant:
Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Tuma v. Jackson Municipal Airport Authority et al
as 3:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
Harold Tuma
Defendant:
Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Caroline Kirkland and Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lynch v. Mountain Laurel Assurance Company et al
as 5:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Lynch and Jason S. Lynch
Defendant:
Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Progressive Direct Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
