Cases
John Doe, et al v. St. Stephen's Episcopal School, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-41108
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: JOHN DOE, II, JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE, III
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: ST. STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL and ROBERT E. KIRKPATRICK, His Predecessors and Successors, as Headmaster of St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of Texas
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES LYDELL TUCKER, DON A. WIMBERLY, The Right Reverend, His Predecessors and Successors, as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas and PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH COUNCIL OF THE DIOCESE OF TEXAS
Amicus Curiae: TEXAS ASSOCIATION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT and SURVIVORS NETWORK OF THOSE ABUSED BY PRIESTS
In re: St. Stephen's Episcopal School, et al
as 09-40827
Petitioner: In re: ST. STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL, ROBERT E. KIRKPATRICK, His Predecessors and Successors, as Headmaster of St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of Texas, DON A. WIMBERLY, DD, The Right Reverend, His Predecessors and Successors, as Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas and others
Plaintiff - Respondent: JOHN DOE, II, JOHN DOE, III and JOHN DOE
Doe, IV v. St. Stephen's Episcopal School et al
as 1:2009cv00537
Plaintiff: John Doe, IV and John Doe, IV
Defendant: St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Robert E. Kirkpatrick, Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHN DOE IV v. St. Stephen's Episcopal School et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00127
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE IV
Defendant: St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Robert E. Kirkpatrick, Protestant Episcopal Church Council of the Diocese of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?