Cases 11 - 20 of 59
McClain v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2019cv01085
Defendant:
John Hamilton and Public Defenders office
Plaintiff:
James Lee McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. District Attorney Office et al
as 1:2019cv01007
Defendant:
District Attorney Office, Mitchell Raines, Public Defender and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Prosecutor et al
as 2:2018cv02742
Petitioner:
Frederick Shovell Rodgers
Respondent:
Public Defender, Judge Cambell and Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lassiter v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 2:2018cv02304
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Lassiter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Memphis Police Department, Shelby County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Partin et al
as 3:2017cv01607
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dale Adkins
Defendant:
John Partin and The McMinnville Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggs v. McKinney et al
as 3:2017cv01429
Plaintiff:
Terrence Biggs
Defendant:
Sean Thomas McKinney and Metro Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. United States Public Defenders et al
as 1:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
United States Public Defenders, Kunya Kenta, Joe Cecil Rhea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt v. 17th Judicial District Public Defenders Office
as 3:2016cv00810
Plaintiff:
George A. Belt
Defendant:
17th Judicial District Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huddle v. Honoski et al
as 2:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Keith Huddle, Jr.
Defendant:
Amy M. Honoski and Sullivan County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redwine v. Rutherford County Public Defender's Office
as 3:2015cv00598
Petitioner:
Jason Lowell Redwine
Respondent:
Rutherford County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
