Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Parker v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Donnie Parker Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated doing business as Spring Creek Ranch
Defendant:
Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Southwestern Public Service Company doing business as Xcel Energy and Osmose Utility Services, Inc.
Brandt Engineers Group, Ltd v. Xcel Energy, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Defendant:
Southwestern Public Service Company and Xcel Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandt Engineers Group, Ltd. d/b/a Brandt Engineers and Brandt Engineers Group, Ltd doing business as Brandt Engineers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Southwestern Public Service Company v. Bolttech Mannings, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Bolttech Mannings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Public Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2019cv00626
Defendant:
Arthur C. D'Andrea, Shelly Botkin, Ken Paxton and others
Plaintiff:
NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc., Lone Star Transmission LLC, NextEra Energy Transmission Midwest, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Entergy Services, LLC, Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, Entergy Texas, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Southwestern Public Service Company v. Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Public Service Company
Defendant:
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen,et al v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Charlie Allen , Sharon Allen , William Tucker and others
Defendant:
Xcel Energy, Inc. and Southwestern Public Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
