Cases
Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe
as 14-1816
Petitioner: Monique Da Silva Moore, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Maryellen O'Donohue, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Laurie Mayers, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent: Publicis Groupe SA and MSLGroup
Movant: Impact Fund and WorkLife Law
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00707
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
In Re: Monique Moore
as 12-5020
Petitioner: Monique Da Silva Moore, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Maryellen O'Donohue, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Laurie Mayers, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent: Publicis Groupe SA and MSLGroup
In Re: Monique Moore
as 12-5020
Petitioner: Monique Da Silva Moore, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Maryellen O'Donohue, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Laurie Mayers, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent: Publicis Groupe SA and MSLGroup
PERLSTEIN v. SAATCHI & SAATCHI SCIENCE et al
as 2:2012cv02589
Plaintiff: MERAV PERLSTEIN
Defendant: SAATCHI & SAATCHI SCIENCE, SAATCHI & SAATCHI HEALTHCARE INNOVATIONS, PUBLICIS HEALTHCARE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01279
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?