Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORROW v. WEST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2013cv07536
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MORROW
Defendant:
WEST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP, MARK G. PUGLIESE and BRIAN STUTZMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGLIESE v. DAVIS
as 2:2013cv01760
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. PUGLIESE
Defendant:
CHARLES R. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv07073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pugliese v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01568
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Pugliese
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ruddy v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
Michael J Ruddy and Cherilynn M. Ruddy
Defendant:
United States Of America, US Postmaster Potter, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
STEVEN M. PETERSON, LLC et al v. WATER JEL TECHNOLOGIES LLC et al
as 5:2010cv06826
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. PETERSON, LLC and ADVANCED SKIN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
WATER JEL TECHNOLOGIES LLC, ADVANCED VISION RESEARCH, INC., PUGLIESE PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
