Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tule River Indian Tribe of California v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03222
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Alameda, California et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02307
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: County of Alameda, California and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Costa Mesa et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02320
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: City of Costa Mesa and The People of the State of California
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Santa Ana et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv02324
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Santa Ana City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho and CITY OF SANTA ANA
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of San Clemente et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02326
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through San Clemente City Attorney Scott C. Smith and City of San Clemente
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
County of Alameda, California v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler et al
as 3:2019cv02317
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, JONATHAN D. SACKLER, an individual and as trustee for TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEMBERS OF THE RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler and County of Alameda, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Westminster et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02325
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Westminster City Attorney Richard D. Jones and City of Westminster
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?