Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Putman v. J.C. McDaniel Construction, LLC; et al
as 1:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
Michael Putman
Defendant:
J.C. McDaniel Construction, LLC;, Crystal Creek Inert Landfill, LLC and Jerry C. McDaniel, Jr.
Putman v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Larry Putman
Defendant:
United States of America and Chadwick Bain Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Mitchell v. Pleiman et al
as 3:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Justin R.W. Mitchell
Defendant:
Eric Matthe Pleiman, Derrick W. Holmes and Putman County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PUTMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20134
Plaintiff:
ADAM PUTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PUTMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14451
Plaintiff:
BRANDON PUTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v ROBERT HOYT PUTMAN, et al
as 7:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ROBERT HOYT PUTMAN and ROLLIEGH HIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
PUTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04139
Plaintiff:
ADAM PUTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
