Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Inmar Brand Solutions, Inc. v. Quotient Technology Inc.
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Inmar Brand Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Wieder v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07406
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald and others
Floyd v. Quotient Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Quotient Technology, Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Smith v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07068
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Wang v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06593
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Lorraine Hariton and others
O'Dell v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06464
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang, Nathan Smith and Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Jody Gessow and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Andrew Gessow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Result Marketing Group, Ltd. v. Southeastern Grocers, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Result Marketing Group, Ltd.
Defendant:
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., JOHN DOES (1-10), Southeastern Grocers, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01610
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Schoenmann v. Boal et al
as 3:2020cv00196
Defendant:
Steven R. Boal and Quotient Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lynn E. Schoenmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
