Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wang et al v. JFD Sushi Restaurant Inc et al
as 1:2022cv04401
Defendant:
Liguang Lin, Fei Teng, JFD Sushi Restaurant Inc doing business as Tenzan 89 Japanese Cuisine and others
Plaintiff:
Chunming Wang, Xian Qing Ye and Ruiyan Liu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 FLSA: Minimum Wage
Wang v. Breitfeld et al
as 1:2022cv00525
Nominal Defendant:
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. and Property Solutions Acquisition Corp.
Plaintiff:
Shaobo Wang
Defendant:
Carsten Breitfeld, Zvi Glasman, Jordan Vogel and others
Moubarak v. Breitfeld et al
as 1:2022cv00467
Nominal Defendant:
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. and Property Solutions Acquisition Corp.
Plaintiff:
John Moubarak
Defendant:
Carsten Breitfeld, Zvi Glasman, Walter J. McBride and others
Wangjun Zhou v. Carsten Breitfeld et al
as 2:2022cv01852
Plaintiff:
Wangjun Zhou and Property Solutions Acquisition Corp.
Defendant:
Carsten Breitfeld, Zvi Glasman, Walter J. McBride and others
Robert C. Farazmand v. Carsten Breitfeld et al
as 2:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
Ashkan Farazmand and Property Solutions Acquisition Corp.
Defendant:
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc., Carsten Breitfeld, Zvi Glasman and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Wangjun Zhou and Property Solutions Acquisition Corp. (consol case
Ye v. Holder
as 13-3996
Petitioner:
Qing Ye
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Qiqing Ye v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-15354
Petitioner:
QIQING YE, a.k.a. Qi Qing Ye, a.k.a. Yan Ying Ni
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ye v. Xin Wei Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03239
Plaintiff:
Qing Qing Ye
Defendant:
Xin Wei Enterprises, Inc. and Wei Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
