Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. ARM Holdings PLC
as 1:2024cv00490
Defendant:
ARM Holdings PLC and ARM LTD.
Plaintiff:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Korabeck v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
Jadwiga Korabeck
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Qualcomm Incorporated Long-Term Disability Plan and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Ford v. Aberle et al
as 1:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Donald J. Rosenberg, Jeffrey Henderson and others
Nominal Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford
Eshraghi v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, et al
as 5:2018cv07667
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated Group Disability Income Plan, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, A Massachusetts and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Seyed Eshraghi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Compal Electronics Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Defendant:
Compal Electronics Inc. , FIH Mobile Ltd. , Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Telepet USA, Inc. v Qualcomm, Incorporated, et al
as 2:2015cv00846
Defendant:
Dudley Fetzer, James Hoffman, Qualcomm, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Telepet USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gabriel Technologies Corporation et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al
as 8:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Technologies Corporation and Trace Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Norman Krasner, Qualcomm Incorporated and Snaptrack, Inc.
Material Witne:
Louis Rotella, III and Louis Rotella, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Qualcomm Incorporated v. XATA Corporation
as 3:2010cv01337
Plaintiff:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Defendant:
XATA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
