Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Harris v. QT Company
as 1:2022cv04147
Plaintiff: James Harris
Defendant: QuikTrip Company, Zachary Austin and QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Booker v. QuikTrip Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00715
Plaintiff: Katina Booker
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Avdic v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff: Izet Avdic
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Corona v. Quiktrip Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff: Ivan Corona
Defendant: Quiktrip Corporation, ABC Corp. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00005
Plaintiff: Shadayvia Smith and Shardayvia Smith
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Alvarez-Bazalar v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03619
Plaintiff: Armando Alvarez-Bazalar
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaca v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 1:2021cv03620
Plaintiff: Marisol Vaca
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aultman v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03346
Plaintiff: Raymond Aultman
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation, ABC Corp. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mead-Goins v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02838
Plaintiff: Dana Mead-Goins
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation, John Doe Corporation and John Doe Individual
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schrenk v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02132
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation and John Doe
Plaintiff: Cheryl Schrenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?