Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wilson (PS) v. Rollo et al
as 1:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Terance DeJuan Wilson
Defendant:
Rollo, BVCF Warden, Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Aoinelli et al
as 1:2020cv01428
Defendant:
Glissman, Tidelman, Aoinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Terance D. Wilson
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Terance D. Wilson, #117681
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2019cv03533
Defendant:
O. Taylor, Zwirn, Annable and others
Plaintiff:
Terance D. Wilson
Interested Party:
TO THE CASE MANAGER/INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Terance D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bresselsmith v. Quinlin et al
as 3:2016cv00610
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Bauman and Quinlin
Plaintiff:
David Bresselsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Quinlin, et al
as 16-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS TOMMY VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON QUINLIN, SCF, Security Correctional Officer (C/O), JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General for the State of Colorado, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Valdez v. Quinlin et al
as 1:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tommy Valdez
Defendant:
Jason Quinlin, John W. Suthers, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Quinlin, et al
as 15-1172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROGER DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY QUINLIN, BILDREAYA, ZWIRN and others
Duncan v. Quinlin et al
as 1:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
James R. Duncan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Quinlin, Bildreaya, Zwirn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Quinlin v. Deputy Kevin Keitz, et al
as 12-14888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY S. QUINLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN KEITZ, K-9 Deputy and JOHN CLARK
QUINLIN v. TUCKER
as 5:2011cv00333
Petitioner:
JONATHAN E QUINLIN
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
