Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hill v. P.A.M. Cartage Carriers LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Hill
Intervenor:
Sedgwick CMS Inc
Defendant:
P.A.M. Cartage Carriers LLC, P.A.M. Transport Inc and Nicholas M Petrino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
David v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2019cv01082
Defendant:
Gary L Lumpkin, FNU Williams, FNU Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David v. Savage et al
as 5:2019cv00789
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Edmond Police Department, Kathryn Savage and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00288
Plaintiff:
Makayla R Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Hill et al
as 2:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David R. Hill, Paula E. Hill, DeeAnne C. Gilgen and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00459
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Hill
as 5:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Natasha R Hill
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Hill v. Skywest et al
as 2:2010cv01076
Plaintiff:
Suelen R. Hill
Defendant:
Skywest and Hartford Financial Services Group, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hill v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv01304
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Hill
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alderton, et al v. Crown Cork Seal Co, et al
as 1:1994cv01034
Plaintiff:
John R. Alderton , Jacquelin F. Alderton , Richard W. Armistaed and others
Defendant:
Crown Cork and Seal Company , Asbestos Claims Management Corporation and Lloyd L. Crocker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
