Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Keenan Wilkins v. Barber, et al
as 23-15511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBER, First Name Unknown, Doctor, S. GATES, R. RECAREY, Chief Executive Officer and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE ESCOBAR and SPECIAL APPEARANCE
(PC) Verduzco v. Jao et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Daniel Verdusco and Daniel Verduzco
Defendant:
B. Jad, L. Areja, Z. Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keenan Wilkins v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70047
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KEENAN G. WILKINS, CHRISTINE BARBER, R. RECAREY, Chief Executive Officer and others
Petitioner:
KEENAN G. WILKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Keenan Wilkins v. Barber, et al
as 21-15361
Defendant / Appellee:
R. RECAREY, Chief Executive Officer, ANISE ADAMS, Chief Medical Executive, S. GATES and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE ESCOBAR and SPECIAL APPEARANCE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
(PC) Taylor v. Adams et al
as 2:2019cv02375
Defendant:
N. Malakkla, S. Palagummi, John Sonza and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Taylor and Bernard Glen Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wilkins v. Barber et al
as 2:2019cv01338
Defendant:
Christine Escobar, R. Singh, Christine Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Keenan Wilkins and Nerrah Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hunter v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv01101
Defendant:
Gabriel Williams, N. Malakkla, Raul R. Recarey and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Carr v. Balaji et al
as 2:2019cv00688
Defendant:
G. Church, S. Suson, R. Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. CDCR et al
as 2:2017cv01247
Defendant:
CDCR, M. Martel, R Recarey and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
