Cases 41 - 50 of 85
John Mann v. Secretary, Florida DOC, et al
as 11-13057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. MANN
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, R. SHANNON, DR. JOHNSON and others
SHANNON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv39825
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. SHANNON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
United States of America v. Shannon et al
as 3:2011cv03063
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Karra R Shannon, Andrew J Sloat and City of Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Logan v. Yates et al
as 1:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wesley C. Logan
Defendant:
James A. Yates, John Dovey, M.C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Gil v. James Yates, et al
as 11-15266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO J. GIL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, J. WOODEND, M. C. DAVIS and others
Bakhtiari v. Yates et al
as 1:2011at00025
Defendant:
James A. Yates, Y. A. Gonzales, Tim Widlund and others
Plaintiff:
Morteza Bakhtiari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry Jameson v. John Marshall, et al
as 11-55048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY SIMON JAMESON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, individual and official capacity, Warden of California Mens Colony, D. ENGLER, individual and official capacity, Correctional Counselor II, T. L. COOK, individual and official capacity, Captain of guards at CMC East and others
Barry Jameson et al v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
Belton, Belton, P D Brazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
Bradford v. Yates et al
as 1:2010cv02074
Plaintiff:
Darrell Bradford
Defendant:
James A. Yates, M. C. Davis, R. Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jameson v. Yates et al
as 1:2010cv02001
Plaintiff:
Barry S Jameson
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. D. Brazelton, R. Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
