Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. US Postal Employees et al
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson and Ronald Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Employees and Securus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Employees et al
as 4:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Employees and US Postmaster Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04169
Petitioner:
R Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02429
Petitioner:
R Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
R Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 4:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs and U.S. Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. 10th Appeals Ct, et al
as 6:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
R. Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
10th Appeals Ct and Judge Robert Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Tipton et al
as 6:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Drew B. Tipton, US Attorney Houston Jennifer B. Lowery, Judge Drew B. Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
