Cases 1 - 10 of 1,627
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stone v. USA
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Dustin R. Stone
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
James et al v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Lesia R. James, Lena Koropey and Boris O. Koropey
Defendant:
Linda Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Parker v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sanders v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Sanders
Defendant:
Deputy Whitaker, Deputy Parrish, Deputy Clevidance Toman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diversified Production LLC v. Horn et al
as 7:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Diversified Production LLC
Defendant:
James R. Horn and Congetta Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Thomas v. USA
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Reginald R. Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNichols v. Hatton et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Captain Zackary Eubanks, Warden Bobbi Jo Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
