Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mitchell v. Galey et al
as 1:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dewey Mitchell
Defendant:
Galey, Avenal State Prison Medical Staff, R. Chapnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Brammer v. James Yates, et al
as 13-15877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES W. BRAMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden, R. CHAPNICK, Chief Medical Officer, M.D., N. KUSHNER, M.D., Pleasant Valley State Prison and others
Nawabi v. Cates et al
as 1:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Idris Nawabi
Defendant:
Cates, L. Zamora, J. Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Chapnick et.al.
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
George Edward Summers
Defendant:
R. Chapnick, M Boparai, J. Biol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Brammer v. James Yates, et al
as 12-17091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES W. BRAMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden, R. CHAPNICK, Chief Medical Officer, M.D., N. KUSHNER, M.D., Pleasant Valley State Prison and others
Mark Shehata v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-56799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK F. SHEHATA
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Sec'y Dept of Correc., M. POULOS, Warden, CIM, J. HARTLEY, Warden, ASP and others
Mark F. Shehata v. Mathew Cate et al
as 5:2010cv01246
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, R Chapnick, Dr Conanan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark F Shehata
Brammer v. Yates et al
as 1:2007cv01350
Plaintiff:
James W. Brammer
Defendant:
James A. Yates, R. Chapnick, N Kushner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brush v. Woodford et al
as 1:2007cv01009
Plaintiff:
Gary H. Brush
Defendant:
J. Woodford, Peter Farber-Szekrenyi, James A. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Chapnick et al
as 1:2007cv00202
Plaintiff:
James Jordan
Defendant:
R. Chapnick, R Hansen, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
