Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Chung et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv06953
Plaintiff:
Carlo Napolitano, John E. Uhri, Linda B. Robertson and others
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 5, Grocery Outlet, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, incorrectly designated as Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Denton v. Bibbs et al
as 1:2019cv00316
Defendant:
R. Fisher, A. Martinez, K.R. Nash and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-15142
Defendant / Appellee:
OLIVEIRA, A. PACILLAS, Correctional Counselor, A. LACKOVIC, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
C&C Building Automation Company, Inc. et al v. Dupler
as 3:2018cv06692
Plaintiff:
Charles R Chavez, Omniboard, Inc., Charles M. Chavez and others
Defendant:
Charles Dupler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chavez v. Wong et al
as 1:2018cv00417
Respondent:
Judge Paul B.K. Wong, DPA Thalia Murphy and Attorney Salina Kanai Althof
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Petitioner:
Leonardo R. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Alfredo Romero-Chavez
as 18-10290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALFREDO ROMERO-CHAVEZ, AKA Alfredo R. Chavez, AKA Alfredo Romero Chavez, AKA Alfredo Chavez-Romero
Chavez v. Wong et al
as 1:2017cv00550
Plaintiff:
Leonardo R. Chavez
Defendant:
Paul B. K. Wong, Thalia Murphy, John Schum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cramblit v California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, et al
as 1:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
James Cramblit
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, R Chavez, S. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
