Cases 1 - 10 of 39
(PC) Martin v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Jerardo Gutierrez, E. Guthery, A. Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Chavez v. Matteson
as 3:2022cv02819
Petitioner:
Marcos R. Chavez
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Chavez v. Matteson
as 2:2022cv00751
Petitioner:
Marcos R. Chavez
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bender v. Santoro et al
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
JT Walker, O. Moncibiaz, Destiny Morales and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Eugene Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bender v. Santoro et al
as 2:2021cv00440
Defendant:
JT Walker, O. Moncibiaz, Destiny Morales and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Eugene Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Hardy v. Santoro et al
as 2:2021cv00375
Defendant:
J. Valencia, D. Ceballos, J. Dohs and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hardy v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2021cv00327
Defendant:
J. Valencia, D. Ceballos, J. Dohs and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chung et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv06953
Plaintiff:
Carlo Napolitano, John E. Uhri, Linda B. Robertson and others
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 5, Grocery Outlet, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, incorrectly designated as Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Denton v. Bibbs et al
as 1:2019cv00316
Defendant:
R. Fisher, A. Martinez, K.R. Nash and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
