Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kohen Uhuru v. Chaplain Hadjaj, et al
as 20-55550
Defendant / Appellee:
M. LUKASIK, Psychologist Supervisor, O'DELL, CCI, Custody Case Worker/Counselor at ICC-UCC, S. SANCHEZ, Captain in Ad Seg at the RJD Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU
Christopher Gaither v. Gregory David, et al
as 16-11107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEE GAITHER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY S. DAVID, Assistant Warden, RAY D. CRUZ, Captain, GENE W. SMITH, Captain and others
Martin Vazquez v. George Neotti, et al
as 14-56555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN TORRES VAZQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. NEOTTI, Warden, Chief Warden, SUGLISH, Acting Warden, B. KOEN, Captain and others
Ramon Murillo v. Rucker, et al
as 14-55415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON A. MURILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
RUCKER, Correctional Officer, OWENS, Correctional Officer, CEDANO, Correctional Officer and others
John Cordrey v. Richard Harrington, et al
as 14-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. CORDREY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden at Menard Prison, ALEX JONES, Assistant Warden of Operations at Menard Prison, L. PHELPS, Correctional Officer/Internal Affairs Investigator at Menard Prison and others
Enrique Mosquera v. Deana Davis, et al
as 13-10936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENRIQUE ANDRADE MOSQUERA
Defendant - Appellee:
DEANA R. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, JOHN H ADAMS, Head Warden, ZONIA SCOTT, UGI and others
Martin Vazquez v. B. Koen, et al
as 12-57018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN TORRES VAZQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
B. KOEN, Captain, R. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, GEORGE A. NEOTTI, Warden, Chief Warden and others
Christopher Murphy v. John Adams, et al
as 12-10629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MURPHY, also known as Christopher Murphy, also known as Christopher J. Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ADAMS, Senior Warden II, LARRY BERGER, Assistant Warden, TOSHA JAMES, Director FHA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
