Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Farrell v. Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03439
Petitioner: Mitchell Clyde Farrell
Respondent: R E Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fonua v. Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv03126
Petitioner: Pelisi Foketi Fonua
Respondent: R. E. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Barnes
as 2:2009cv00361
Petitioner: Enrique Rudy Gomez
Respondent: R E Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomez v. Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00291
Petitioner: Enrique Rudy Gomez
Respondent: R E Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutledge v. Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv05738
Petitioner: Tom Rutledge
Respondent: R E Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell v. Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02755
Petitioner: George Lee Campbell
Respondent: R. E. Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tackett v. Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02636
Petitioner: Steven Michael Tackett
Respondent: R. E. Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adam Nix v. R. E. Barne
as 08-56764
Petitioner - Appellant: ADAM H. NIX, AKA Adam Henry Nix
Respondent - Appellee: R. E. BARNES, Warden
Kevin King v. CDC, et al
as 08-17223
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN EUGENE KING
Defendant - Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, V - RENDON, Sergeant, A. DAZO and others
Adam Henry Nix v. R. E. Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv06475
Petitioner: Adam Henry Nix
Respondent: R. E. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?