Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Cole et al v. Chang et al
as 2:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Devin Paul Cole and Olufolake Ogunlade
Defendant:
Philemon D. Chang, MD, Ms. Ellerbee, Ms. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff v. McCullough et al
as 2:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Chester Lowe Huff
Defendant:
Tamara McCullough, Louis R. Herklotz, Eva Villarreal and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales et al v. Frandeli Group, LLC
as 3:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Alejandrea Gonzales and Paula R Gonzales
Defendant:
Frandeli Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv05024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Harris v. Perez et al
as 2:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Carlos Luran Harris
Defendant:
Cesario S. Perez, Rosa Mitchell, Jim Kaelin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzales v. Reyes et al
as 4:2008cv02308
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Gonzales
Defendant:
Jose Reyes, Tommy Thomas and Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Esomo v. Barrows et al
as 3:2007cv01814
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Esomo
Defendant:
Angela K Barrows, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Kammar v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00322
Petitioner:
Joma Kammar
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vemuri v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv01479
Plaintiff:
Arun Tej Vemuri
Defendant:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
