Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
David R. Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Bouchard v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Morton S Bouchard
Defendant:
David R Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. McDonough
as 24-1375
Claimant:
TERRIS R. JONES, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Jones v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as ID/3:23-CV-00511
Plaintiff:
Jones and DeLisa R Jones
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Deelen v. Jones
as 4:2023cv03729
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Van Deelen
Defendant:
David R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. McDonough
as 23-1843
Claimant:
TERRIS R. JONES, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
