Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Petitioner: THOMAS R. JONES
Defendant: PAROLE COMMISSION
Respondent: JONES MICHELE and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PUTMAN v. GRASSLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02890
Defendant: CHUCK GRASSLEY, MARMICE ROSS, STAPLE and others
Plaintiff: ARTHUR PUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUTMAN v. GRASSLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02891
Defendant: DE ROSA, STAPLES, CHUCK GRASSLEY and others
Plaintiff: ARTHUR PUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCDANIEL v. JONES et al
as 1:2017cv02790
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MCDANIEL
Defendant: R. JONES, BOND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01853
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JONES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv01145
Plaintiff: EDWARD L. JONES and DONNETTA R. JONES
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
JONES v. BCBG MAX AZRIA GROUP, INC.
as 1:2010cv00598
Plaintiff: NONA R. JONES
Defendant: BCBG MAX AZRIA GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02197
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Plaintiff
JONES v. DC DEPT OF CORR, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2000cv02140
Plaintiff: ANGELA R. JONES
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DARRYL ELLISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00559
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?