Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sean Houston, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN HOUSTON
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE KRISTINI DAVENPORT TRUST
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, US Department of Justice, JANET YELLEN, US Department of Treasury, DEBORAH HAALAND, US Department of Interior and others
Carolyn Primm v. TN Dept of Corrections, et al
as 19-6100
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HAMILTON, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, EUGENIE BAIRD WHITESELL, Assistant Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROLYN PRIMM
Robert DeShetler, Jr., et al v. FCA US LLC, et al
as 19-3012
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US LLC, INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, REGION 2B
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SHARP, LEAH R. WITHROW, SHAWN MADALINKSI and others
State of Ohio, ex rel., Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General v. Superior Fibers, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01843
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel., Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General
Defendant:
Superior Fibers, Inc., William R. Miller, Superior Bremen Filtration, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
United States of America v. Miller
as 5:2013mc00075
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Michael R, Miller
Marcum v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Marcum
Defendant:
Selina R Miller, r, Karen Johnson, John Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2012mc00040
Plaintiff:
Selina R Miller, r
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Mitchell J. Brown, Davida Koroma and others
Miller v. Huntington National Bank et al
as 2:2012mc00030
Plaintiff:
Selina R Miller
Defendant:
Keith Troy, New Salem Baptist Church and Huntington National Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
