Cases 1 - 10 of 25
SMITH v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE R SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, DEPUTY WARDEN MIMS, CAPTAIN BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Geo Secure Services et al
as 1:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
Arthur Antonio Johnson
Defendant:
Geo Secure Services, D. Bryne, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. United States
as 4:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith, William T. Moore, Christopher Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau O. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States
as 1:2020cv01482
Defendant:
United States, William T. Moore, Christopher Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau O. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince, Timothy Adams, Nick R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles, Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv02233
Plaintiff:
Quentin O. Smith
Defendant:
Arsenio R. Smith and Kevin J. Hopson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayner v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Rayner
Defendant:
Cobb County, Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Donald L. Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. EDENFIELD et al
as 7:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
BERRY AVANT EDENFIELD, W LEON BARFIELD, G R SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. OWENS et al
as 7:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, AVANT EDENFIELD, W LEON BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02507
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
William O'Kelly, E. Clayton Scofield, Sam Olens and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
