Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Tello v. Honigman et al
as 2:2021cv00724
Plaintiff:
Karina Tello
Defendant:
Peter Honigman, City of Lovington, James R. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv00874
Defendant:
April Vigil, Teresa Valdez, Angel Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Forrest Evans, Ernestine Hodge and Rapido MVD Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaro v. State of New Mexico
as 1:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Amaro
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Susana Martinez, Bill Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Summer et al
as 2:2012cv01220
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Williams
Defendant:
FNU Summer and FNU Jamie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillen v. State of New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Guillen
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Corrections Department, Joe R Williams, Gregg Marcantel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gonzalez v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Penelope Gonzalez
Defendant:
The New Mexico Corrections Department , Joe R Williams , Anthony Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacobs v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Petitioner:
Shawn Louis Jacobs
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo , Joe R Williams and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacobs v. Bravo et al
as 6:2011cv00024
Petitioner:
Shawn Louis Jacobs
Respondent:
Erasmo Bravo , Joe R Williams and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
