Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Lennon v. Lawler et al
as 3:2012cv00930
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jason Lennon
Defendant:
R.M. Lawler, C. Green, B. Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. LAWLER et al
as 5:2010cv07556
Petitioner:
HECTOR RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
R.M. LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lawler et al
as 1:2010cv02586
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Defendant:
R.M. Lawler , Fisher , Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. PA. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv02568
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hawkins
Defendant:
PA. Department of Corrections , S.C.I. - Huntingdon , R.M. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv05658
Petitioner:
JAIME SANTIAGO
Respondent:
R.M. LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYNNE ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAXTER v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2010cv02369
Petitioner:
ALBERT BAXTER
Respondent:
R.M. LAWLER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWKINS v. LAWLER et al
as 4:2010cv01040
Plaintiff:
Robert Hawkins
Defendant:
R.M. Lawler, J.D. Fisher, B. Ewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Lawler et al
as 3:2010cv00849
Plaintiff:
Anthony Owens
Defendant:
R.M. Lawler, Connie Green, B. J. Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2009cv04709
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAWKINS
Defendant:
R.M. LAWLER, J.D. FISHER, B. EWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeSavage v. Grove et al
as 3:2009cv01204
Plaintiff:
Christopher James DeSavage
Defendant:
Brenda Grove, D. MacEachern, H. Glorioso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
