Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rahim v. Rush
as 8:2020cv01198
Defendant:
C. Rush
Plaintiff:
Aquil I. Rahim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rahim v. Wicomico County Department of Corrections
as 8:2020cv01191
Plaintiff:
Aquil I. Rahim
Defendant:
Wicomico County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rahim v. USA - 2255
as 1:2019cv00957
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
David Kendall Rahim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Choice Hotel International, Inc. v. Ray's Hospitality, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00213
Defendant:
Ray's Hospitality, LLC, Ray's Asset Management, LLC, Suborna Simontinee and others
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotel International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Gipson v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2016cv01393
Plaintiff:
Clarence Rahim Gipson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rahim, Inc. v. Mindboard, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01155
Plaintiff:
Rahim, Inc.
Defendant:
Mindboard, Inc. , Abhijit Verekar , Tarak Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gipson v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2015cv01298
Plaintiff:
Clarence Rahim Gipson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abbass et al. v. Nakhla et al
as 8:2013cv01577
Plaintiff:
Lokha Rida Abbass , Shakir Mohamed , Ahmed Fawzi Rashid and others
Defendant:
Adel Nakhla, L-3 Services, Inc., Engility Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Rahim v. State's Attorney et al
as 1:2012cv00371
Plaintiff:
Aquil Rahim
Defendant:
State's Attorney and Jennifer L. Hastings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hariri et al v. The American Insurance Company, one of The Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies
as 1:2010cv03025
Plaintiff:
Rahim Hariri and Negin Hariri
Defendant:
The American Insurance Company, one of The Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
