Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Alvarado v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Joseph Beahm, et al
as 24-1126
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH BEAHM, JOHN BIRDYSHAW, BRIAN FOSTER, Warden and others
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Mathew Burns, Chad Geschke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Lucas Billie, et al
as 23-2610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCAS BILLIE, DANILLE JONES, JESSE JONES and others
Alvarado v. Burns et al
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew Burns and Ryan Kuepper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado Vasquez v. Indian Fusion Foods, LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ramon Alvarado Vasquez
Defendant:
Indian Fusion Foods, LLC. a Colorado Corporation doing business as Paradise Biryani Pointe and Shilpa Kutchalakanti
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alvarado v. Alderman et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Officer Alderman, Joseph Beahm, John Birdyshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, John Birdyshaw, Officer Felski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Nikita Barbeau, Jodi Barrett, Sgt Joseph Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, Alderman, John Birdyshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
