Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Crystallee Ramos v. Sergio Alvarez, et al
as 22-13117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRYSTALLEE RAMOS
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGIO ALVAREZ, ALVAREZ PLASTIC SURGERY, PLLC and MIA AESTHETICS CLINICS, LLC
v. Ramos et al
as 1:2022cv21618
Defendant:
Crystallee Ramos, Dr. Sergio Alvarez, Alvarez Plastic Surgery, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Ramos v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2022cv21619
Plaintiff:
Crystallee Ramos
Defendant:
Sergio Alvarez, Alvarez Plastic Surgery, PLLC and Mia Aesthetics Clinics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Raymond Ramos v. Nabors Completion and Production Services Co. et al
as 2:2022cv01632
Petitioner:
Raymond Ramos
Respondent:
Nabors Completion and Production Services Co.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Haljohn-San Antonio Inc v. Ramos
as 3:2020cv01140
Plaintiff:
Haljohn-San Antonio, Inc. and Haljohn-San Antonio Inc
Defendant:
Maria E Ramos
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Abernathy et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07545
Respondent:
Doordash, Inc.
Petitioner:
Malik Abdulhaqq, Terrell Abernathy, Parisa Aalami and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Guess Inc. v. Marisol Russell et al
as 2:2016cv00780
Respondent:
Dana Anderson, Melissa Porcello, Damaris Ramos and others
Petitioner:
Guess, Inc.
Guess?, Inc. v. Marisol Russell et al
as 2:2015cv05191
Defendant:
Dana Anderson, Melissa Porcello, Damaris Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Guess? Inc
Squitieri-Sifontes et al
as 3:2013cv01794
Plaintiff:
Paul Squitieri-Sifontes , Emma Gomez-De Perez , Nelson Ramos-Irizarry and others
Defendant:
UBS Bank USA , UBS Financial Service, Inc. , UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
