Cases 1 - 10 of 40
DUCKETT et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2026cv00355
Plaintiff:
JAMES DUCKETT and DOMINICK OCCHICONE
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, RICHARD COMERFORD, RANDALL POLK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUCKETT v. COMERFORD et al
as 4:2026cv00354
Plaintiff:
JAMES DUCKETT
Defendant:
RICHARD COMERFORD and RANDALL POLK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belton v. Polk et al
as 3:2026cv00854
Plaintiff:
Darylvon J. Belton
Defendant:
Randall Polk, Michael Kelly, Alan Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Dixon et al
as 3:2026cv00469
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Taylor
Defendant:
Warden Randall Polk and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glover v. Dixon, et al
as 3:2026cv00410
Plaintiff:
LaDarius Glover
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, John Godwin, Sgt. Andrew Winningham and others
Respondent:
Nicole Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. DIXON et al
as 1:2026cv00038
Plaintiff:
LADARIUS GLOVER
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, JOHN GODWIN, DENNIS HORCULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2025cv00504
Plaintiff:
FRANK A WALLS
Defendant:
SECRETARY RICKY DIXON and WARDEN RANDALL POLK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2025cv00488
Plaintiff:
FRANK A WALLS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and RANDALL POLK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tullis v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00933
Plaintiff:
Terrelle Tullis
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Warden Randal Polk, Colonel Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
David Terence Stephens
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Randall Polk and Paul Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
