Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Randall Rolle v. Nicole Raysor, et al
as 15-12664
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee: NICOLE RAYSOR, Probation Officer, BRIAN ENGLES, Supervisor, Department of Corrections, M. LILJA DARDELAKE, Attorney and others
Rolle v. Maceluch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00285
Plaintiff: Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant: John Maceluch, Kathleen Kirwin and James Hankinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. Edwards et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00271
Plaintiff: Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant: Philip Wayne Edwards, William C. Sherrill, Jr., J. L. Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. Raysor et al
as 5:2015cv00268
Plaintiff: Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant: Nicole Raysor, Brian Engles, M Lilja Dardelake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Rolle v. Philip Edwards, et al
as 15-12026
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee: PHILIP WAYNE EDWARDS, WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR., STEPHEN P. MICKLE and others
Randall Rolle v. John Maceluch, et al
as 15-11874
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN MACELUCH, KATHLEEN KIRWIN and JAMES HANKINSON
In re: Randall Rolle
as 15-11764
Petitioner: In re: RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Randall Rolle v. Nicole Raysor, et al
as 15-11750
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee: NICOLE RAYSOR, BRIAN ENGLES, LILJA M. DANDELAKE and others
Rolle v. Edwards et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00202
Plaintiff: Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant: Philip Wayne Edwards, William C. Sherrill, Jr., Stephen P. Mickle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rolle v. Glenn
as 5:2015cv00190
Plaintiff: Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant: Emily Glenn and Sherri West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?