Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Randall Rolle v. State of Florida, DOC
as 19-11296
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Rolle v. City of Tallahassee et al
as 5:2018cv00045
Defendant:
David Collins, Judge Thomas Bateman, City of Tallahassee and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolle v. City of Tallahassee et al
as 5:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
City of Tallahassee, Owen McCaul, James Hankinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolle v. Shelfer et al
as 5:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
James Shelfer, Emilly Glenn, Sherri West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolle v. Robinson et al
as 5:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Roderick Robinson, Demetris Taylor, Stacey Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolle v. West et al
as 5:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
Sherri West, Emilly Glenn, Michael Macnamara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Randall Rolle v. Judge, et al
as 17-14931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE, EMILY GLENN, Probation Officer, SHERRI WEST, Supervisor and others
ROLLE v. ROBINSON et al
as 4:2017cv00306
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
RODERICK ROBINSON, DEMETRIS TAYLOR, MARTIN FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLE v. SHELFER et al
as 4:2017cv00307
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
JAMES SHELFER, EMILY GLENN, SHERRI WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Rolle v. Charles Perry, et al
as 17-12854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES PERRY, SAM BRUCE, RANDY FRAZEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
