Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Raney v. Goehl et al
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Adam Raney
Defendant:
Officer Goehl, Officer Wodak, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raney, Adam v. Taylor, Andrew et al
as 3:2021cv00485
Plaintiff:
Adam S Raney
Defendant:
Andrew Taylor and Executive Keefe Group LLC.
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumas v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al
as 2:2019cv01702
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, J Jay Goodman, Kenosha Beef International and others
Plaintiff:
Olton Lee Dumas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Raney, Kenneth v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00782
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jay Raney, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raney, Kenneth v. U.S.
as 3:2015cv00663
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jay Raney, Sr.
Respondent:
U.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raney, Kenneth v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00639
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kenneth Raney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raney v. USA
as 3:2015cv00174
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jay Raney, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raney, Kenneth v. State of Wisconsin, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jay Raney, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Department of Corrections and All other people and departments, known and unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raney, Kenneth v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00584
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Raney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raney vs. Hollingsworth, et al
as 1:2009cv00292
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jay Raney
Respondent:
Lisa J.W. Hollingsworth, Department of Corrections, Department of Probation and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
