Cases 11 - 15 of 15
BYRD v. SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01934
Plaintiff:
DONETTA BYRD
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and RANKIN MICHAEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAM PENN APARTMENTS, L.P. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS , SUPERIOR COURT OF THE THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , PHYLLIS D. THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PENN APARTMENTS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T. Richardson v. DC, et al
as 11-7114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
T. Carlton Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, institutionally and its Judges, Eric T. Washington and others
In re BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION
as 1:2008mc00511
In Re:
BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
NICOLE F.J. HAMANN, ALVA Y. WALLER and STEPHEN CARPENTER
Plaintiff:
ALL PLAINTIFFS, LINDA BURKES, BOBBIE PACE and others
Defendant:
EDWARD T. SCHAFER, THOMAS J. VILSACK, LILLIE M. WINGARD and others
Interested Party:
HENRY BARRIS, MUHAMMAD ROBBALAA, KARLA K. BATES-ADAMS and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY K. CHESTNUT, JOHN BOYD, BLACK FARMERS AND AGRICULTURALISTS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE'S CENTER FOR CLASS ACTION FARINESS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Love, Rosemary, et al v. Johanns, Michael, et al
as 04-5449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosemary Love, Lind Marie Bara-Weaver, Margaret Odom and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Ann M. Veneman
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael O. Johanns
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
National Women's Law Center, National Partnership for Women & Families, Impact Fund and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
