Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Zapata v. Chavez, et al
as 08-2158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN CHAVEZ, Mayor, E MERCADO, Lt., J HUDSON, Lt. and others
Zapata v. Heredia, et al
as 08-2157
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL HEREDIA, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Zapata v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 08-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, RONALD TORRES and CAPTAIN CANDELARIA
Zapata v. Liz LNU, et al
as 08-2156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
LIZ LNU, City of Albuquerque, Medical Nurse at MDC
Defendant:
RONALD TORREZ, Chief of Corrections, MARTIN CHAVEZ, Mayor of Albuquerque, NM, HENRY POREA, Deputy Chief and others
Zapata v. Porter, et al
as 08-2064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN PORTER, Attorney for the State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office and PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Zapata v. Lopez
as 08-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ, Attorney
Zapata v. Torres, et al
as 08-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD TORRES, Chief of Corrections and RIEL WATSON, Chaplian
Zapata v. Brandenburg
as 08-2031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, KARI E. BRANDENBURG, Second Judicial District Attorney, COUNTY OF BERNALILLO and others
Zapata v. Torres, et al
as 08-2020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL C. ZAPATA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD TORRES, Chief of Corrections and RIEL WATSON, Chaplian
Zapata v. Bernalillo County Detention Center et al
as 1:2007cv01177
Plaintiff:
Raul C Zapata
Defendant:
Bernalillo County Detention Center, Matt Edwell and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
